NEGOCOACH
233
Origin : Classical rhetoric

📜 Classical rhetoric

Oratory & argumentation

Aristotle ("Rhetoric"), Quintilian; C. Perelman & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, "The New Rhetoric", 1958; A. Schopenhauer, "The Art of Being Right".

Full detail in the “Origin & history” section below.

233

Antanaclasis

Rhetoric & verbal sparring Technique 233 / 360
Alexandre Baumberger

Author of the library

Alexandre Baumberger

Negotiation lecturer at KEDGE Business School

A rare threefold background serving negotiation: teaching, commercial justice and audit, backed by experience as a company director in Bordeaux.

  • Teaching, KEDGE Business School Negotiation lecturer since 2014 (12 years).
  • Commercial justice, Commercial Court Judge from 2018 to 2026: litigation, then insolvency proceedings.
  • Audit & advisory, over 20 years Tax, employment and financial audit in major firms, for large groups.
Full profile Contact him
In brief

Antanaclasis repeats the same word in two different senses within a single utterance ("the heart has its reasons which reason knows nothing of"). In negotiation, it serves to turn the opponent's own word against them by changing its meaning, to seal a striking formula, or to shift the ground of the debate subtly through a semantic slide that is hard to counter.

Save to favourites Practise this technique
Reading level

At a glance

Its family profile at a glance

Effectiveness Psychologicalimpact Discretion Preparation Relationalrisk Ethics
6.3 / 10 Tactical potential

Vigilance: moderate (4.5/10) · Preparation required: 5/10

Grounding in the source school Documented school

Indicative profile: it situates the “Rhetoric & verbal sparring” family as the Classical rhetoric school practises it, not this technique taken in isolation. Techniques from the same family and school therefore share the same profile. NEGOCOACH editorial rating out of 10, non-experimental · the higher the “relational risk” value, the more costly the technique is to the relationship.

NEGOCOACH assessment

How to read this rating

Tactical potential 6.3/10 (effectiveness, impact, discretion) and vigilance moderate (relational and ethical risk): two distinct readings, deliberately never merged into a single score that would reward risk. NEGOCOACH editorial rating calibrated from the “Rhetoric & verbal sparring” family and the “Classical rhetoric” school. Each criterion is rated out of 10; click to understand what it measures.

  • Effectiveness 7/10 · High

    How far the technique can carry the negotiation in the intended direction when it is well executed.

  • Psychological impact 6/10 · High

    Strength of the effect produced on the counterpart's perceptions, emotions and decisions.

  • Discretion 6/10 · High

    How hard it is for the other party to notice the technique is being used. A high value = very discreet.

  • Preparation 5/10 · Moderate

    The information, analysis and rehearsal required upfront to use it effectively.

  • Relational risk 3/10 · Low

    Potential cost to the relationship and to trust if the technique is spotted, refused or fails. A high value = riskier.

  • Ethics 5/10 · Moderate

    Moral acceptability: fairness, transparency and respect for the counterpart's autonomy. A high value = more defensible.

Level of evidence

Documented school

The school this technique stems from is documented by recognised work and established practice, without experimental consensus. This indicator qualifies the school, not this technique taken in isolation.

Indicative NEGOCOACH editorial rating, for teaching purposes. For “Relational risk”, a high value signals a cost to the relationship, not a quality.

Antanaclasis in a Nutshell

Origin & History

Antanaclasis (from the Greek antanaklasis, "reflection, reverberation") is a figure of repetition theorised by classical rhetoric and illustrated by the great moralists, Pascali, La Rochefoucauld. Fontanier classifies it among the figures of diction by repetition in his Figures du discours, and the rhetoric of debate wields it as a weapon of repeat-and-reverse.

Definition and Principle

Antanaclasis plays on polysemyi: it captures a word loaded by the other party and shifts its meaning in its own reply. Its effectiveness rests on the element of surprise and on the difficulty of retaliating, since correcting a semantic slide in real time is laborious and looks like quibbling. It allows you to regain the initiative by recovering the opponent's vocabulary, and it fashions memorable formulas through the tension between the two senses of the same term.

Concrete Examples of Application

Application by context

The same technique, across every negotiation settings

Context 1 / 8

Sales negotiation

The buyer: "Your offer is too dear." The seller: "Dear to buy, precious in use." The word slides from "costly" to "of great value", turning the objection into an argument.

How to apply it

Capture the buyer's negative word ("dear", "risky") and replay it in a positive sense to turn the objection without denying it.

Strengths

Turns the attack into a springboard through a lively, memorable play on meaning.

Weaknesses

A pragmatic buyer may deem the device too clever by half and brusquely refocus on the figure.

Context 2 / 8

Procurement negotiation

The seller: "It's an investment." The buyer: "An investment, yes, provided it actually invests something into my profit-and-loss account." The word moves from flattering expenditure to the concrete return demanded.

How to apply it

Take up the seller's flattering word and turn it towards your own criterion (return, proof), demanding that the term live up to its promise.

Strengths

Disarms the seller's marketing vocabulary by requiring them to prove the meaning they invoke.

Weaknesses

The play on words may distract from the real discussion of figures if dwelt on too long.

Context 3 / 8

Labour negotiation

Management speaks of "shared efforts". The union rep: "Shared, indeed, but shared in very unequal parts." The same word denounces the imbalance that the employer's discourse sought to mask.

How to apply it

Take up the other side's rallying word ("sharing", "fairness") to reveal its concrete application, often less flattering.

Strengths

Turns the employer's consensual vocabulary against their own policy.

Weaknesses

The device, if it becomes a tic, comes across as mere rhetoric at the expense of the substantive social issue.

Context 4 / 8

Crisis management

An accuser: "You've lost control." The executive: "We have not lost control, we have taken control of the way out of the crisis." The word moves from the fault endured to the action mastered.

How to apply it

Capture the accusatory word and replay it in a sense that makes you the actor rather than the victim of the situation.

Strengths

Regains the narrative initiative by turning the term of the attack.

Weaknesses

Faced with damning facts, the play on words may seem indecent or evasive.

Context 5 / 8

Political negotiation

An opponent: "Your record is empty." The minister: "Empty of your polemics, yes, full of the reforms you fought against." The word "empty" is turned into a cutting retort.

How to apply it

Political antanaclasis recovers the attack word for word and reverses it, fashioning the retort that marks the debate.

Strengths

Produces the memorable retort that dominates the exchange and then circulates.

Weaknesses

The witticism may mask an evasion of substance that the opponent will point out.

Context 6 / 8

Real-estate negotiation

The seller: "This property is a bargain." The buyer: "A bargain, certainly, for you to sell quickly; for me, it still has to be one on price." The word slides from a windfall to the seller's urgency.

How to apply it

Turn the seller's word ("bargain", "rare") to bring out the seller's own interest in closing, and rebalance the balance of power.

Strengths

Reveals the seller's motivation by playing on the ambivalence of their own argument.

Weaknesses

May antagonise a seller who feels trapped by a play on words that impugns their good faith.

Context 7 / 8

Cross-cultural negotiation

A partner says they want a "fair" agreement. The negotiator: "Fair in the sense of your customs, or fair in the sense of ours? The word does not cover the same thing." Antanaclasis reveals a cultural gap in definition.

How to apply it

In a cross-cultural context, antanaclasis serves to make explicit the divergences of meaning behind an apparently shared word (fairness, respect, commitment).

Strengths

Brings to light hidden semantic misunderstandings, a major source of cross-cultural failure.

Weaknesses

The play on words translates poorly and may, if badly rendered, seem a vexing quibble.

Context 8 / 8

Family negotiation

One brother: "Be fair." The other: "Fair, meaning equal, or fair, meaning proportionate to what each has given?" Antanaclasis opens up the real debate that the word "fair" was concealing.

How to apply it

Take up the moral word invoked ("fair", "normal") to distinguish its senses and unlock the underlying disagreement.

Strengths

Turns an emotional injunction into a negotiable question by unfolding the word's meaning.

Weaknesses

May be experienced as nit-picking that dodges the emotional expectation behind the word.

Counter-techniques

Spot and neutralise this technique

Negotiation is also played on defence. Here is how to recognise this technique when it is used against you, and turn it around.

Detect

The signals that give it away

  • A false alternative ("it's A or B")
  • A sweeping generalisation
  • A loaded question

Neutralise

The counters that defuse it

  • Refuse the false dilemma: "there is a third way"
  • Ask for precise facts
  • Break the question down before answering

Turn around

Turn it into an advantage

Send the question back to its author to regain the initiative.

The trap to avoid

Answering on the terms imposed by the other side.

In Brief

  • Difficulty: Advanced
  • Estimated effectiveness: High
  • Time to deploy: Short, but demands quick wit
  • Fields of application: Political debate, Sales, Verbal jousting, Mediation
  • Synonyms: Repeat-and-reverse, Play on polysemy, Diaphora
  • Tags: antanaclasis, polysemy, repartee, Fontanier, reversal

Strengths and Weaknesses

Antanaclasis recovers the opponent's vocabulary and turns it through a shift of meaning that is hard to counter in real time. It produces the memorable retort and allows you to regain the initiative in the exchange. Its limit: it demands quick-wittedness, translates poorly, and may appear a witticism that dodges the substance if it is not backed by a genuine argument.

When to Use This Technique

Use it to turn a key word of the opponent's, produce a decisive retort, or reveal a gap in definition that is blocking agreement. Avoid it when the facts are damning (the play on words seems evasive) and in multilingual settings without verifying the translation.

How to Recognise and Counter This Technique

Recognise it: the other party takes up your exact word but in a different sense to turn your point around. Neutralise it: pin the meaning down again ("when I say X, I mean precisely this") and refuse the semantic slide. Turn it back: replay the word a third time in a sense that restores your position, dominating the play on polysemy.

Limits and Ethics

Antanaclasis slides towards sophistry when the shift of meaning serves to dodge the argument rather than to illuminate it: playing on words in order not to answer is a delaying tactic. The risk is to favour brilliance over substance. Ethical rule: the semantic play must serve the clarity of the debate, not the escape from it.

Variants and Related Techniques

Close to the Chiasmus and the Antimetabole when the word is crossed, and to Diaphora. Combines with Slanted Reformulation. It stands opposed to univocal argument and to the rigorous definition of terms.

Going Further

  • Blaise Pascal, Pensees, 1670.
  • Pierre Fontanier, Les Figures du discours, 1821-1830.
  • Bernard Dupriez, Gradus: les procedes litteraires, 10/18, 1984.

Aims of the Technique

  • Turn the other party's words around by altering their meaning, to regain the initiative without head-on confrontation
  • Reframe a key term of the debate (price, value, risk, trust) by giving it a second sense more favourable to your position
  • Create a memorable, hard-hitting formula that anchors the message in the other party's mind and resists being forgotten
  • Ease the atmosphere or defuse a tension with a touch of wit, while still carrying a substantive argument
  • Mark a light rhetorical superiority that reinforces your credibility and authority in the exchange

Famous Cases

Sales · Turning the word 'cost' in a procurement negotiation: A buyer declares: 'Your solution has too high a cost.' The salesperson replies: 'What has a high cost is not our solution, it is doing without it.' The word 'cost' is taken up but its sense slides from the purchase price to the opportunity cost. By reusing the buyer's exact term, the seller reframes the debate from expenditure to lost earnings, without contradicting the other party head-on. This kind of lexical reversal is a representative pattern for the use of antanaclasis in sales.

Everyday life · The same word, two senses, to settle a dispute: During a tense discussion between neighbours over sharing the cost of a fence, one throws out: 'I want this to be fair.' The other replies: 'Then let us be fair: the fence protects us both, so let us share it fairly.' The word 'fair' moves from a moral demand ('equitable') to an adverb of action ('precisely, equitably'), turning a claim into a concrete proposal. A representative scenario showing how antanaclasis turns a posture into a solution.

Common Mistakes

  • Confusing antanaclasis with a mere gratuitous pun: if the double meaning does not serve an argument, the effect seems futile and undermines the speaker's credibility
  • Forcing the figure onto a poorly chosen word, or one whose double sense is far-fetched: the other party perceives the artifice and digs in
  • Overusing it: repeated too often in the same exchange, the technique becomes a rhetorical tic that grates and rings false
  • Adopting a condescending or triumphant tone, which turns a witticism into humiliation and hardens the opposing position
  • Using antanaclasis in a very formal, technical or emotionally grave context, where the stylistic flourish seems out of place or even insulting

Scientific Foundations

  • Olivier Reboul (1991) Introduction a la rhetorique Presses Universitaires de France (PUF)
  • Chaim Perelman & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca (1958) Traite de l'argumentation. La nouvelle rhetorique Presses Universitaires de France (PUF)

Quick exercise

Test yourself before answering

Answer in your head, then reveal the solution. Memory is built through active recall.

1 Quels signaux doivent vous alerter ?
  • A false alternative ("it's A or B")
  • A sweeping generalisation
  • A loaded question
2 Quelles parades appliquer ?
  • Refuse the false dilemma: "there is a third way"
  • Ask for precise facts
  • Break the question down before answering

Frequently asked questions

The questions we get most

What is the "Antanaclasis" technique?

Antanaclasis repeats the same word in two different senses within a single utterance ("the heart has its reasons which reason knows nothing of"). In negotiation, it serves to turn the opponent's own word against them by changing its meaning, to seal a striking formula, or to shift the ground of the debate subtly through a semantic slide that is hard to counter.

Is the "Antanaclasis" technique ethical?

It sits on the line: effective, but it can tip into manipulation if it exploits an information asymmetry. Use it with measure and without deliberate deceit.

How do you defend against "Antanaclasis"?

Answering on the terms imposed by the other side. The right reflex: refuse the false dilemma: "there is a third way".

What is the "Antanaclasis" technique based on?

NEGOCOACH does not assess the experimental validation of this technique in isolation. What we document is the grounding of its source school (Classical rhetoric): documented school. Full detail is in the "At a glance" section of this page.

Practise with AI

Three ready-to-use prompts

Copy, paste into your assistant, replace the [brackets]. Works with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Mistral, Perplexity.

Prepare

Build your plan before the meeting

You are an expert negotiation coach. Help me prepare to use the "Antanaclasis" technique in the following situation: [describe your situation]. Give me: the conditions for success, a 3-step script, my counterpart's likely objections and how to answer them.

ChatGPT Claude Perplexity

Simulate

Rehearse against an AI counterpart

Play the role of my counterpart in a negotiation. I am going to test the "Antanaclasis" technique. React realistically and with resistance, do not give in too quickly, then at the end analyse my performance and suggest 3 concrete improvements.

ChatGPT Claude Perplexity

Debrief

Analyse a past negotiation

Here is how my negotiation went: [paste the exchanges]. Analyse whether the "Antanaclasis" technique was used well, what worked, the mistakes made, and spell out precisely what I could have done better.

ChatGPT Claude Perplexity

References

Bibliography & credible sources

Founding works of the 📜 Classical rhetoric school this technique belongs to.

  • Cover: You Can Negotiate Anything

    You Can Negotiate Anything

    Book

    H. Cohen · 1980

    The best-seller that democratised negotiation: everything is negotiable, provided you understand power, time and information. Accessible in tone and full of everyday examples.

  • Cover: Everything is Negotiable

    Everything is Negotiable

    Book

    G. Kennedy · 1982

    A practical guide to negotiating in daily life as in business, centred on conditional exchange and firmness on your interests. Kennedy hunts down the negotiator's "soft" reflexes.

Aristotle ("Rhetoric"), Quintilian; C. Perelman & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, "The New Rhetoric", 1958; A. Schopenhauer, "The Art of Being Right".

On video

See the technique in action

Videos to picture Antanaclasis and anchor it through examples.

Search for videos Examples & demonstrations

A verified video selection is being enriched; the search above already surfaces the best videos on the topic.

Technique map

Where this technique sits

Every technique sits within a network: what it draws on, what it combines with, where it applies, and how to defend against it.

Levers engaged

biases & emotions

Fields of application

Sales negotiation Procurement negotiation Labour negotiation Crisis management Political negotiation Real-estate negotiation Cross-cultural negotiation Family negotiation

Countered by

Spot its signals, neutralise it and turn it around with the defensive playbook on this page.

See the counter-techniques

Key takeaways

  • En une phrase

    Antanaclasis repeats the same word in two different senses within a single utterance ("the heart has its reasons which reason knows nothing of"). In negotiation, it serves to turn the opponent's own word against them by changing its meaning, to seal a striking formula, or to shift the ground of the debate subtly through a semantic slide that is hard to counter.

  • The right reflex

    Send the question back to its author to regain the initiative.

  • Never do this

    Answering on the terms imposed by the other side.

6.3/10 tactical potential Moderate vigilance Documented school

Master this technique in real situations?

Our programmes turn theory into a concrete advantage.

Explore our programmes
← Technique n°232 Prolepsis (anticipating objections) Technique n°234 → Loaded Reframing

Related techniques

The full library →
232 Prolepsis (anticipating objections) 234 Loaded Reframing 235 The Dialectical Reversal (retorsion) 230 The Rhetorical Concession (concessio)
Call Book a call